Research ยท September 1, 2026
A review of the research on patient recall and health literacy, and practical guidance for writing pre-op and post-op instructions that patients can understand and act on.
Clinicians spend real effort writing pre-op and post-op instructions. The research on patient recall explains why so much of that effort is lost, and it points to practical changes that make written instructions work better. This review summarizes the findings most relevant to procedural care and how they shape the way we design instructions in Vervi.
The most cited summary of this literature is a review by Kessels in the *Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine*. It reports that 40 to 80 percent of medical information provided by practitioners is forgotten immediately, and that a large share of what patients do remember is recalled incorrectly.
The review identifies several factors that make recall worse:
It also identifies factors that help: presenting the most important information first, being specific rather than general, grouping related instructions, and supplementing conversation with written and visual material patients can return to.
Recall is only part of the problem. Patients also need to understand and act on what they read. Federal health literacy guidance treats this as a universal precaution: structure information so that everyone can understand it, instead of trying to identify which patients need simpler material.
The AHRQ Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit recommends simplifying communication and confirming understanding with every patient. The CDC Clear Communication Index provides a scored checklist for written material, covering a clear main message, plain language, specific behavioral recommendations, and visual support.
Taken together, the research suggests a short list of practices for pre-op and post-op instructions:
Several Vervi features are direct responses to this research:
Good instructions start with good clinical content. The research is a reminder that how that content is structured and delivered has a large effect on whether patients can use it.
A widely cited review by Kessels (2003) reports that 40 to 80 percent of medical information provided by practitioners is forgotten immediately, and that much of what is remembered is recalled incorrectly.
Plain everyday words, one action per step, the most important actions first, specific numbers and times, and short sections with clear headings. Health literacy guidance from AHRQ and the CDC recommends these practices for all patients, not only those with low literacy.